Tuesday, June 10, 2014

The true costs of caring


The parents of children with intellectual and developmental disabilities often have to cut back on or quit work, and once those children reach adulthood they often have a limited earning potential.

Those income losses, plus the price of services can reach more than $2 million across a person’s lifespan, according to USA Today. These costs are on top of the typical costs of care for a developing individual.

Things need to change to bring down the costs for families and society, according to David Mandell, director of research for the Center for Mental Health Policy and Services at the University of Pennsylvania.

Adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities need more job opportunities. There are many small success stories of individuals or small groups of people who are employed, but "we need to be more creative about thinking about employment on a large scale," Mandell said.

Families need more opportunities to stay in the workplace. "If we had more family-friendly workplace policies, we might see substantial change in the way families were able to manage the work-life balance when they had children with (all kinds of) disabilities."

Society needs to take the long view, he said. Spending money diagnosing and helping young children will probably save money when they are older, by reducing disability and improving employability. "We often talk about the cost of care, and we don't spend much time talking about the cost of not caring," he said.

Wednesday, June 4, 2014

Register Now for Upcoming Training



June 12th 
The ADAAA applies to all private employers with 15 or more employees.  If you are a federal contractor or subcontractor you are subject to Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act and if you receive federal financial assistance under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act you must comply regardless of the number of employees you have.

Participants will be able to:
  1. Determine whether the ADAAA applies to their organization.
  2. Analyze whether the organization’s employee handbook adequately informs employees about the ADAAA.
  3. Identify the two categories of applicants or employees who qualify for a reasonable accommodation.
  4. Identify three examples of applicants or employees who do not qualify for a reasonable accommodation.
  5.   Identify the how a formal complaint is lodged regarding an employer’s failure to reasonably accommodate a disability covered by the ADAAA.

June 19th 
Work Life Balance. Is there such a thing?  Half would argue it is possible and half would say it is not.  True work life balance can happen, it is up to you.  Attendees will learn to define Balance for you and learn strategies to organize your time and life to maximize balance.  All levels of staff would appreciate the tips shared in this discussion.

June 23rd 
Effective communication with people with disabilities begins with an evaluation of attitude, power and prejudice. This session will have the participants examine the role that power plays in their interactions with those with disabilities and will give each an opportunity to practice new ways of understanding, listening and relating to people with intellectual disabilities.

June 25th 
Ring of Safety: Teaching people with disabilities the skills to prevent abuse. People with intellectual disabilities are the most sexually victimized group in society. This workshop will look at causes and prevention strategies. We will look at the various skills needed to teach people with disabilities in order to reduce their vulnerability as well as discuss the reporting of abuse - how to take a report and how to make a report.

June 30th 
Even if your agency doesn’t rely on the Internet to do business, you still have billions of pieces of valuable information to protect. Sales records. Client data. Donor data. Personnel records. Medical histories.  Inventory.  Passwords only go so far.

Learn exactly what cyber liability is, how it has evolved over the last decade, how it impacts almost every business today in some way, the extensive nature of the risks involved and how to protect your agency from compromised data security.  We’ll touch on the many regulations that govern corporate responsibility and look at some examples of recent claims and the aftermath. You’ll learn a bit about insurance jargon and coverage that will that help lift the fog around cyber liability.

July 10th 
Performance Evaluations are a dreaded must, but they don’t have to be!  Attendees will review traditional models and share the concept of coaching models that increase employee participation and engagement while reducing the burden on managers.  Managers and executive would benefit from this session.


July 15th 
The Choking Prevention and Dysphagia Diets training will provide participants with an understanding of the choking risks of individuals with developmental disabilities and prevention strategies. This training will enable staff to: 
  • Develop awareness of the incidence of eating difficulties and choking among individuals with developmental disabilities
  • Describe the eating and swallowing processes
  • Describe the factors that contribute to a higher incidence of choking in individuals with developmental disabilities
  • Identify red flags for choking and the agency reporting procedures
  • Describe various diets and liquid consistencies used to address eating difficulties
  • Implement techniques and strategies to assist individuals to eat safely and prevent choking
  • Discuss protocol for techniques to intervene in choking incidents

July 24th 
Projects and tasks are mounting at a rapid pace while organizations continue to try to do more with less to ensure long-term viability.  Attendees will learn tips to structure tasks, manage projects, set reminders and most importantly improve communication skills to ensure everyone is on the same page.  All levels of staff would appreciate the tips shared in this discussion.

Monday, June 2, 2014

KanCare inspector general faces scrutiny

Kansas legislators with oversight of Kansas’ privatized Medicaid system called for special scrutiny of the person hired by the state to identify fraud in the $3 billion-a-year health care network.

Phil Hermanson was recently appointed as inspector general by the secretary of the Kansas Department of Health and Environment. Hermanson previously worked in commercial real estate and has a background that includes a business backruptcy, personal financial problems, DUI conviction and campaign finance violations. 

Hermanson has no college degree or career experience in insurance, legal, accounting, health care, or law enforcement fields applicable to examining conduct of clients and service providers interacting with insurance companies.

“With an active FBI investigation into KanCare financial arrangements ongoing, it would have made more sense to hire an inspector general with appropriate academic and career credentials, in addition to a personal history that was above reproach,” Sen. Laura Kelly of the KanCare committee said to the Topeka Capital Journal. Read More…

Friday, May 30, 2014

Legislature adjourns for 2014

Rep. David Crum, one of three House
members not seeking re-election.
During the brief House session today, four-term Rep. David Crum, R-Augusta, two-term Rep. Kelly Meigs, R-Lenexa, and two-term Rep. Jim Howell, R-Derby, said goodbye to the House, announcing they will not seek re-election.

The Senate also passed a resolution congratulating retiring Revisor of Statutes staffer Ken Wilke for more than 40 years of service to the state.

Thursday, May 22, 2014

Bruffett to replace Sullivan as KDADS secretary

Kari Bruffett named new
KDADS Secretary
Gov. Sam Brownback's office announced on Tuesday that Shawn Sullivan, secretary for the Department of Aging and Disability Services will become the new state budget director and Kari Bruffett, currently head of the division of healthcare finance at the Kansas Department of Health and Environment, will step in as the new KDADS leader.

“Kari’s experience with the KanCare program and her ability to forge collaborations will serve the citizens of Kansans well. I am grateful to both Shawn and Kari for their dedication to the state and appreciate their willingness to serve," Brownback said in a prepared statement.

According to KHI News Service, reactions to the staffing changes are mixed, though both Sullivan and Bruffett are generally well regarded by those familiar with the state's two leading Medicaid agencies.

"We are very thankful for Shawn Sullivan's willingness to work so closely with the intellectual and developmental disability community," said Tom Laing, Executive Director for InterHab. "The work done at KDADS often times directly impacts persons with disabilities and the organizations that serve them. We are looking forward to building a close relationship with the new secretary."

Tuesday, May 13, 2014

2014 Legislative Session Wrap-Up

Tom Laing, Executive Director
InterHab


The 2014 legislative session will be remembered in the disability arena as one in which virtually no forward motion occurred.  

The final nail was pounded into the coffin of managed care carve-out advocacy, a Federal directive was reluctantly heeded to end the under-served waiting list, a few dollars were thrown at the un-served waiting list, and no action was taken to address our low reimbursement rates.  

In other words, our experience was similar to many groups.  Ask teachers, environmentalists, children’s groups, fair tax advocates and you will hear the same story.  The 2014 session was mostly frustrating and fruitless and sometimes downright destructive.

KanCare:  Some talk was promoted in the Capitol regarding KanCare vigilance but the only outcome worth noting was a “prompt payment act” (HB 2552) to assure that vendors have a legal right to demand prompt payment from MCOs.  Otherwise, with rare exceptions – for example Rep. Jim Ward continued to offer the active voice of opposition – most legislators had the same shoulder-shrug as in the past, as if to say, “What can we do? The deal is done.”

Waiver Stewardship: As in prior years, our quality-based (Q-base) expansion message was heard (allocate new resources equally for waiver expansion and for capacity expansion via improved reimbursement rates) but the message was ignored. Some money was spent, grudgingly, to end the under-served waiting list (because the Federal government insisted) and at the end of the session, funding for 77 of the more than 3000 on the unserved list was appropriated...  an embarrassingly paltry effort. No money was provided for rate enhancements. The outcome? Quality expansion of waiver services will be hampered by depressed rates and the resulting workforce shortages; and the waiting list will grow, not shrink, due to the ongoing ambivalence to the size of the waiting list.

Family advocacy remained alive on the autism front: Some new success was achieved in the passage of legislation encouraging autism insurance coverage. This was a tribute to organized autism family advocacy and a handful of legislators who would not be told NO despite the active opposition of the insurance industry. Some will assert that they continue to have some problems with the legislation, but the forward motion of this effort will certainly create an evidentiary record that this (and other) disability insurance mandates are not the industry-wrecking laws that some insurers claimed.

InterHab member energy is already being gathered for new mission-renewal initiatives in 2015: With this round of KanCare debate settled for now, for better or worse, InterHab members have already begun to make plans to revitalize Q-Base advocacy for 2015. This State’s performance must simply be brought into the light, so that the public and policymakers can weigh the inadequacy of current reimbursement rates, and the increasingly shocking neglect so demonstrated by growing waiting lists.

What is our assignment for the coming weeks and months? Relationship building and electoral accountability come to the front of the discussion.

Two groups of legislators demand our immediate advocacy attention. The first group consists of Senators, none of whom are required to run for reelection in this election cycle. These men and women uniformly need to be reminded of the importance of disability initiatives. The second group would be House members who are running again in November, but who find themselves unopposed. They will almost certainly be back in January for another term of office.  Since they have no campaigns to run, they have time to see you and talk to you. From this day forward, make it a priority to meet and confer with them to remind them of your concerns, reintroduce them to their neighbors with disabilities and their families whom they may have forgotten about, and emphatically describe for them the cost of neglect when it comes to the needs of the disability service network. 

And then there is the election: As you know, we do not advocate for or against any candidate or question on the ballot. Your organizations, also, are politically neutral in the tug of war that is the election process. HOWEVER, we all have a right and a responsibility to inform one another about the actions of the legislature, and legislators, and governors.

You all know, for the most part, whether your legislators or governor have been good or bad for disability services. You know whether they have been accessible and receptive. You also know that your actions have a direct bearing on how a legislator responds. 

Legislators who support you: You know these men and women. They take your calls. They visit your organizations AND they usually vote WITH you when they are asked to do so. Each of them is entitled to the most appreciative words of encouragement from all of us, and your stakeholders should be told of those legislators who do support you.

Legislators who are adrift: Some legislators, when they do not hear compelling information about our issues, have drifted away into an uninformed position, and have not been reliable supporters of your efforts. They are on-again, off-again at best. These are legislators for whom we want to redouble our educational efforts. Each of them could become a “friend” in the coming session if we all do our jobs. 

Legislators who turn their backs on you: These are the ones who most frustrate us. They know the issues, they have been reached out to, touched, educated, connected with your stakeholders, but they usually do NOT vote with you, and sometimes they are openly HOSTILE to your advocacy.  What do we do with these legislators? There is one sensible approach. Get to know the candidate that has chosen to run against them. Educate those new candidates and introduce them to the constituents that you work for.  And, if you like them, as citizens you have a right, on your own time, to act in accordance to your electoral instincts.


As for the Governor’s race? Do what you think is best, unless your “best” is a rocking-chair position. Our government works well only when we the people make it work well. The time for action is now. 

Friday, May 2, 2014

To: Members of the Kansas House of Representatives and the Kansas Senate

May 2, 2014

Dear Legislator: 

This session, as in the past, we have urged a more responsible and humane allocation of resources for community services for persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities (I/DD).  We are however disappointed once again in the outcomes that we will have to report to Kansans around the State who had been hoping for progress.  We will report little progress on waiting lists and no progress on reimbursement rates for community organizations. 

We are glad for the I/DD waiting list funding for 77 persons in the final budget considerations, and glad that Federal officials demanded the State address the underserved waiting list. But, please recognize that serving 77 persons from a waiting list which currently numbers in excess of 3,000 is not progress. 
The waiting list in the coming year will get longer, not shorter.   

Additionally, community service providers will once again fail to secure any relief for reimbursement rates that have not been increased in more than 6 years. Only once during this administration’s tenure has a reimbursement rate been proposed by the state agency which oversees our programs, and even that tiny 1% recommendation – 60% of which would have been paid by the Federal government – was removed from the Governor’s budget for 2014-2015 recommendations. Add to that the greatly increasing administrative costs for all organizations in their dealings with the three managed care insurance companies, and you can better understand the financial pressures they face. 

This excerpt from the Kansas Developmental Disability Reform Act spells out the law that has been routinely ignored:

39-1806. Establishment of system of funding, quality assurance and contracting. To carry out the provisions of this act, the secretary shall establish after consultation with representatives of community developmental disability organizations and affiliates thereof, and families and consumer advocates:
(a) A system of adequate and reasonable funding or reimbursement for the delivery of community services.. 

No one who votes for this budget can claim it is either adequate or reasonable … no can they claim they have met their obligations under the law.   Six years of rates unadjusted to keep up with increasing costs is inadequate and unreasonable. The needs of our most vulnerable citizens cannot be met when the care-givers for those citizens are treated with such ambivalence.  The needs of vulnerable Kansans with I/DD can only be met if each of you prioritizes their lives and their needs.  

Before you write your final newsletters, remember this: 
You will deceive yourselves if you believe those who claim that progress was made in this two-year budget for persons with developmental disabilities. Everyone affected knows the truth, and they will be asking you to work harder in the future to direct your executive and legislative leadership to reverse this pattern of neglect.   
We have not, and will not, lay this matter solely at your feet. Previous legislatures and governors had their chances to do better but didn’t. This cycle has to change, and it has to start with each of you. 
Two final thoughts:
  • We urge you to begin preparing for the coming interim as a time for planning, and that you insist upon the Administration’s assistance, to meaningfully reduce the waiting list, and to make good on the promise of restoring reasonable reimbursement rates for your community’s organizations that do this valuable work. Both goals must be addressed, in tandem.
  • We urge you also to look at the many millions in KanCare savings that have been touted, as a source for your enhancements to our budget. We all have a right to know whether those savings are real, and if so, then to utilize them as a funding source to re-invest in programs which are currently struggling. 

We appreciate the many responsibilities you are asked to carry, and the hard work you are asked to perform; and we believe you are owed an honest assessment of this session’s performance on behalf of the community I/DD network. 

We ask for your thoughtful consideration of these concerns.  


Respectfully, 


Tom Laing, (Topeka) Executive Director 


On behalf of the Executive Committee of InterHab:
Lori Feldkamp, President (Manhattan)
Alice Lackey, Vice President (Seneca)
Doug Wisby, Treasurer (McPherson)
Brenda Maxey, Secretary (Hutchison)
Jerry Michaud, Board Member-at-Large (Hays) 
Shelia Nelson-Stout, Board Member-at-Large (Salina)
Ron Pasmore, Board Member-at-Large (Wichita)
Colin McKenney, Past-President (Wichita)